David French, a prominent conservative writer, recently engaged in a Twitter exchange with Senator JD Vance regarding Ukraine’s role in the ongoing conflict with Russia. French took issue with Vance’s characterization of Ukraine, asserting that the country is unequivocally “the good guy” in the situation.
The exchange began when Vance commented on reports of Ukraine’s alleged involvement in attacks on Russian territory. French responded by emphasizing Ukraine’s right to defend itself against Russian aggression, stating that Ukraine’s actions were justified given the context of the conflict.
JD Vance criticizes “American leaders” who pick a side in the war in Ukraine: “Unfortunately, you got a lot of American leaders who like to beat their chest and say; this [Ukraine] is the good guy and this [Russia] is the bad guy.” pic.twitter.com/dcAcnKehTX
— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) October 25, 2024
French’s stance sparked a heated debate on social media, with many conservatives expressing differing opinions on the matter. Some supported French’s view, agreeing that Ukraine’s actions were justified in the face of Russian aggression. Others sided with Vance, questioning the wisdom of continued U.S. involvement in the conflict.
The discussion highlighted the ongoing divide within conservative circles regarding foreign policy and America’s role in international conflicts. French’s position reflects a more interventionist approach, while Vance’s comments align with a growing skepticism among some conservatives about U.S. involvement in overseas conflicts.
Ukraine is the good guy and Russia is the bad guy. That’s basic moral clarity.
If Russia succeeds, it’s bad for the United States. That’s basic strategic clarity. https://t.co/VZpPjSo3zJ
— David French (@DavidAFrench) October 25, 2024
Critics of French’s stance argued that the situation in Ukraine is more complex than a simple “good guy vs. bad guy” narrative. They pointed out that geopolitical realities and historical context should be considered when assessing the conflict.
Supporters of French’s position emphasized the importance of standing up to Russian aggression and supporting democratic allies. They argued that Ukraine’s right to self-defense should be recognized and supported by the international community.
The debate surrounding French’s comments underscores the broader discussions taking place within conservative circles about America’s foreign policy priorities and the role of the United States in global conflicts. As the situation in Ukraine continues to evolve, it’s likely that these debates will persist, shaping conservative discourse on international affairs in the coming months and years.