Listen To Story Above
The Trump administration continues to gain momentum in its battle against establishment forces, with recent polls showing Trump reaching peak popularity while Democratic approval ratings hit record lows. Traditional power structures are being challenged as MAGA and digital currency movements gain unprecedented support across diverse demographic groups.
Democratic opposition has crystallized into three main approaches, though their strategy appears to shift frequently. These approaches include resisting deportation of violent illegal immigrants (including those with terrorist group affiliations), leveraging judicial activism, and enabling certain forms of domestic terrorism. This raises questions about potential coordination between these different tactical elements.
Regarding deportation resistance, Representative Jasmine Crockett voiced opposition through a controversial economic argument. She stated: “How many of you are looking to send your kids into hospitality after this college education so that they can go and make the beds at the hotels? How many of you are planning to send your kids to college? … So the reality is that, so long as we live in a capitalist society, there’s always going to be someone or a group of people that will do work that some of the rest of you all don’t want to do. These are the people that are really making us great in this country.”
Chuck Schumer cries 'democracy is dying' on Meet the Press because Trump deported illegal gang members. Let me get this straight,keeping Americans safe from criminals is now tyranny? Dems would rather coddle lawbreakers than protect citizens. Unreal. pic.twitter.com/cpAyPthB90
— ANTONIO BANDERAS (@Banderahs) March 23, 2025
This stance comes despite initial deportation efforts focusing on members of recognized terrorist organizations like Mexican Cartels, MS-13, and Tren de Aragua.
The judicial front has seen unprecedented activism, with data showing half of all presidential administration injunctions since 1963 targeting Trump. Two judges exemplify this trend: Judge Ana C. Reyes, who during confirmation acknowledged: “In 2020, I volunteered for President Joseph Biden’s presidential campaign, providing limited legal assistance regarding potential election law issues.” She’s known for controversial rulings on transgender military service. Similarly, Judge James Boasberg faces scrutiny for potential conflicts of interest due to family connections to NGOs involved in border-related matters.
Chuck Schumer said the quiet part out loud: Democrats are sending astroturf protestors to disrupt Republican town halls. It's not organic. It's acting.
Democrats aren’t a political party. They’re a theater troupe funded by George Soros pic.twitter.com/N2q4czyuzb
— Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) March 21, 2025
The third aspect involves emerging patterns of domestic terrorism. Two distinct trends have emerged: targeted attacks on Tesla vehicles, with one arrest involving a transgender individual, and “swatting” incidents targeting conservative figures. These involve false emergency reports designed to prompt armed police responses to victims’ homes.
This situation warrants comprehensive investigation into potential RICO violations connecting these three strategic approaches. Ann Vandersteel has identified concerning patterns involving Antifa NGOs and IRS financial arrangements. Given the FBI’s extensive J6 investigation, allocating resources to examine these connections seems reasonable, potentially leading to RICO charges against all involved parties, including judicial figures and their associates.
