The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is under fire after fast-tracking a controversial decision that allowed George Soros’ fund to acquire over 220 radio stations. Many see this as a blow to rural Americans and a strategic win for Soros and big corporations.
FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr criticized the process, calling it “the worst abuse of agency process” during his 12 years at the FCC. In an interview with the New York Post, Carr pointed out that the decision happened with no public input and was rushed through without proper procedures.
The FCC’s approval benefits Soros Fund Management, which now controls radio stations that air popular conservative voices like Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, and Mark Levin. Critics question whether these stations will continue to air conservative talk shows, especially with the acquisition happening so close to the upcoming presidential election.
The decision came just days after the FCC granted Dish Network, led by Democrat donor Charlie Ergen, an extension to provide wireless access to rural areas. Carr believes this was another example of backroom deals that kept Republican commissioners in the dark, further suggesting political motivations behind the move.
In addition to Carr’s concerns, Utah Sen. Mike Lee (R) reacted strongly, questioning the timing of Soros’ acquisition so close to Election Day. On social media, Lee said, “Soros buys 200 radio stations weeks before the election. FCC bypasses review process to approve the purchase. What could go wrong?”
This situation has raised eyebrows about the potential influence on the media leading up to the election, especially considering the Soros-backed takeover of conservative-leaning radio networks. The approval process bypassed the usual review for foreign ownership exceeding 25%, which adds to concerns about national security and transparency.
Dish Network defended the decision, stating that their presence in the wireless market is beneficial to American consumers by offering better pricing and innovation. However, the timing and lack of transparency have left many questioning the true motives behind the FCC’s approval.
