
Listen To Story Above
Georgia’s Medicaid contract procurement process has sparked controversy over the inclusion of a transgender-related scenario, while rejected insurers warn of potential healthcare disruptions affecting over a million residents.
The state’s Department of Community Health awarded contracts to four new insurers in a major system overhaul, excluding longtime providers Amerigroup and Peach State Health Plan. The procurement process, managed by the Department of Administrative Services, required bidders to respond to various scenarios, including one about a transgender teenager seeking mental health care.
NEW: Georgia officials are facing backlash after pro-transgender questioning was discovered in process designed for deciding crucial Medicaid contracts.https://t.co/aKSOkAfbpC
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) January 17, 2025
The question involving a 14-year-old transgender individual drew criticism from conservative figures. Jack Posobiec shared on X: “This is ACTUAL text of the use of a transgender question to spend tax dollars.”
The full scenario question reads: [original quote inserted here]
Riley Gaines questioned the decision-making process, while Ryan Fournier criticized the state’s approach. Governor Kemp’s office, through spokesperson Garrison Douglas, clarified that the governor isn’t involved in Medicaid procurement, highlighting Kemp’s conservative record on transgender-related legislation.
"Pathways has cost more than $40 million in state and federal tax dollars, the bulk of which is spent on administration and consulting fees…" #gapol https://t.co/Hfm8eifavI
— Georgia Senate Democrats (@GASenateDems) January 15, 2025
Peach State’s complaint argued that the transgender scenario appeared politically motivated. The insurer, currently serving 700,000 Georgians, warned that contract changes could disrupt healthcare access for 1.17 million recipients.
The successful bidders – CareSource, Humana, Molina Health Care, and United Health Care – promised improved healthcare coverage for vulnerable populations. The state currently allocates over $4 billion annually to manage these programs.
Healthcare providers like Renu Gupta expressed concerns about the transition. “It’s not easy to deal with insurance companies, and I’m worried it’s going to be a terrible transition,” Gupta said. “It’s not fair for the doctors or their practices. And, I’m telling you, these patients are going to suffer for it.”