Bret Baier’s recent revelation about Vice President Kamala Harris’s staff has stirred up quite a storm. The Fox News anchor shared that during an interview with Harris, her team attempted to cut it short when the conversation veered into uncomfortable territory.
Baier spilled the beans on “The Brian Kilmeade Show,” explaining that Harris’s staff tried to wrap things up when he pressed her on President Biden’s age and cognitive abilities. Talk about a sensitive subject!
The interview, which aired on Fox News, saw Baier asking Harris about concerns regarding Biden’s age and mental acuity. He didn’t pull any punches, directly inquiring if she was prepared to step in as president if necessary. Harris, unsurprisingly, defended Biden, insisting he’s “smart” and “vibrant.”
But here’s where it gets interesting: Baier revealed that Harris’s team attempted to shut down the interview when he delved into these sensitive topics. They weren’t too keen on letting the VP field questions about her boss’s fitness for office.
This incident has sparked a flurry of reactions on social media, with many questioning the transparency of the administration. Some are praising Baier for his tough questioning, while others are criticizing Harris’s team for their apparent attempt to control the narrative.
It’s worth noting that concerns about Biden’s age and cognitive abilities have been a recurring theme in political discourse. At 81, he’s the oldest serving president in U.S. history, and his occasional verbal missteps have fueled speculation about his mental sharpness.
This latest episode adds another layer to the ongoing debate about presidential fitness and the role of the media in holding leaders accountable. It also raises questions about the extent to which political staffers should be able to intervene in interviews with public officials.
As the 2024 election looms, it’s clear that Biden’s age and Harris’s readiness to potentially step into the presidency will continue to be important issues. One thing’s for sure: Bret Baier’s revelation has certainly added fuel to an already intense political discourse.